| Author |
Message |
Jonnycerious
US Masters National Champion

Joined: Oct 17, 2007 Posts: 865 Location: 10.4 not 1 base mile in 5 years! Home Track:
Washington Park Bowl |
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 9:49 am Post subject: Any trainer besides the Cateye that create high resistance? |
|
|
Is there any other trainer on the market that create very high resistance besides the cateye(slocom) in the normal trainer cost range? _________________ "Shake & Bake!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joseph
Pro
Joined: Aug 19, 2009 Posts: 1472
Home Track:
|
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kurt Kinetic gives big resistance at high speeds. Check out the chart at the bottom:
http://www.kurtkinetic.com/documents/Power_Curves419.pdf
For starts it doesn't have entirely realistic resistance, but they have a "Pro" flywheel option that makes it better.
Some people use 3M traction tape on the roller to keep it from slipping in sprint efforts. I took mine apart and had the roller knurled. Dropped 1800W today with no slip! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CQ
Pro
Joined: Mar 12, 2009 Posts: 1047
Home Track:
Dick Lane Velodrome |
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joseph •wrote• Kurt Kinetic gives big resistance at high speeds. Check out the chart at the bottom:
http://www.kurtkinetic.com/documents/Power_Curves419.pdf
For starts it doesn't have entirely realistic resistance, but they have a "Pro" flywheel option that makes it better.
Some people use 3M traction tape on the roller to keep it from slipping in sprint efforts. I took mine apart and had the roller knurled. Dropped 1800W today with no slip!
A Continental Trainer tire with alcohol works fine, too. I've put 2,000W into a Cateye during a standing start effort using a continental trainer tire. The key is to get the gearing plus resistance setting right for it to feel like the real thing.
The problem with the Kurt fluid trainer is that you have to build up speed to get resistance, which leaves you at less than 100% when you are at the target resistance. You can't get instant resistance as in a standing (or slow rolling) start. You need a mag trainer to do that.
I have the Kurt mag trainer with the optional extra flywheel. I use it on it's highest setting and it's still not enough resistance for me. I'm at 1 notch under the highest setting on one-legged efforts. I'm back to using my Cateye. I'm happy to have it.
I'd be interested in finding a modern mag trainer that offers high resistance, too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jonnycerious
US Masters National Champion

Joined: Oct 17, 2007 Posts: 865 Location: 10.4 not 1 base mile in 5 years! Home Track:
Washington Park Bowl |
Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2012 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
CQ •wrote• Joseph •wrote• Kurt Kinetic gives big resistance at high speeds. Check out the chart at the bottom:
http://www.kurtkinetic.com/documents/Power_Curves419.pdf
For starts it doesn't have entirely realistic resistance, but they have a "Pro" flywheel option that makes it better.
Some people use 3M traction tape on the roller to keep it from slipping in sprint efforts. I took mine apart and had the roller knurled. Dropped 1800W today with no slip!
A Continental Trainer tire with alcohol works fine, too. I've put 2,000W into a Cateye during a standing start effort using a continental trainer tire. The key is to get the gearing plus resistance setting right for it to feel like the real thing.
The problem with the Kurt fluid trainer is that you have to build up speed to get resistance, which leaves you at less than 100% when you are at the target resistance. You can't get instant resistance as in a standing (or slow rolling) start. You need a mag trainer to do that.
I have the Kurt mag trainer with the optional extra flywheel. I use it on it's highest setting and it's still not enough resistance for me. I'm at 1 notch under the highest setting on one-legged efforts. I'm back to using my Cateye. I'm happy to have it.
I'd be interested in finding a modern mag trainer that offers high resistance, too.
Yes exactly. The Kurt Kinetic is ok for flying but not even close for the low end stuff. I guess nothing exists in a normal trainer  _________________ "Shake & Bake!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ewwhite
Cat 3
Joined: Dec 26, 2003 Posts: 183 Location: Evanston, IL Home Track:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bleve
Cat 2
Joined: May 30, 2008 Posts: 316 Location: Mernda, Victoria, Australia Home Track:
Blackburn Cycling Club Velodrome |
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2012 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jonnycerious •wrote• CQ •wrote• Joseph •wrote• Kurt Kinetic gives big resistance at high speeds. Check out the chart at the bottom:
http://www.kurtkinetic.com/documents/Power_Curves419.pdf
For starts it doesn't have entirely realistic resistance, but they have a "Pro" flywheel option that makes it better.
Some people use 3M traction tape on the roller to keep it from slipping in sprint efforts. I took mine apart and had the roller knurled. Dropped 1800W today with no slip!
A Continental Trainer tire with alcohol works fine, too. I've put 2,000W into a Cateye during a standing start effort using a continental trainer tire. The key is to get the gearing plus resistance setting right for it to feel like the real thing.
The problem with the Kurt fluid trainer is that you have to build up speed to get resistance, which leaves you at less than 100% when you are at the target resistance. You can't get instant resistance as in a standing (or slow rolling) start. You need a mag trainer to do that.
I have the Kurt mag trainer with the optional extra flywheel. I use it on it's highest setting and it's still not enough resistance for me. I'm at 1 notch under the highest setting on one-legged efforts. I'm back to using my Cateye. I'm happy to have it.
I'd be interested in finding a modern mag trainer that offers high resistance, too.
Yes exactly. The Kurt Kinetic is ok for flying but not even close for the low end stuff. I guess nothing exists in a normal trainer 
53x12 and the heavy flywheel is pretty good, IME. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joseph
Pro
Joined: Aug 19, 2009 Posts: 1472
Home Track:
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 1:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bleve •wrote• 53x12 and the heavy flywheel is pretty good, IME.
Just curious, what sort of top-speeds can your guys get with the small FW? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
velodroom
Cat 4
Joined: May 11, 2007 Posts: 84
Home Track:
I lack a home track! I should set one in my profile! |
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:25 am Post subject: Any trainer besides the Cateye that create high resistance |
|
|
Of cause the mag based function of the Wattbike.
For a 2500W sustainable effort is a torque needed in the range of 159 N.m. in combination with 150 rpm.
I happen to have a device, which in terms of torque at least theoretically goes way beyond the figure of 159 N.m.
Torque behaves approximately linear with rpm, when mag based. So you can calculate.
The instant load is so high, that you have to be mentally prepared.
If not, there's a good chance you come to a halt.
But the likes of Chris Hoy train with a device, which creates up to 700 N.m.
They don't tell how much speed and wattage they achieve in this situation.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
matchsprint
UCI Elite
Joined: Jun 17, 2004 Posts: 654
Home Track:
I lack a home track! I should set one in my profile! |
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Velotron? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bleve
Cat 2
Joined: May 30, 2008 Posts: 316 Location: Mernda, Victoria, Australia Home Track:
Blackburn Cycling Club Velodrome |
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joseph •wrote• Bleve •wrote• 53x12 and the heavy flywheel is pretty good, IME.
Just curious, what sort of top-speeds can your guys get with the small FW?
Wrong question - the question should be "how quickly can they accelerate it?"
I'd need to go back over a heap of power files from last winter's ergo program to find out, and I'm lazy  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hppy4u2
Cat 3
Joined: Aug 04, 2005 Posts: 172 Location: Wisconsin Home Track:
Washington Park Bowl |
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Jon,
With my Kurt Kinetic (smaller flywheel) and 3M tape I usually see around 40.5-42 mph which according to my Powertap ends up around 1650-1700 watts.
It's really nice for even standing starts because the resistance comes on fairly quickly so that you are struggling with a second or two. No wheel slip occurs for the first 6-7 efforts so your best workouts. After that I believe the "grit" on the tape seems to lose some adhesion and you start to smoothen the area where the tire comes into contact with the roller.
Dan
ps. I thought on the Kurt Kinetic site there was a retrofit for the normal Kurts to accomodate a larger/heavier flywheel.
http://www.kurtkinetic.com/resistance-unit-p-153-l-en.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hppy4u2
Cat 3
Joined: Aug 04, 2005 Posts: 172 Location: Wisconsin Home Track:
Washington Park Bowl |
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Jon,
With my Kurt Kinetic (smaller flywheel) and 3M tape I usually see around 40.5-42 mph which according to my Powertap ends up around 1650-1700 watts.
It's really nice for even standing starts because the resistance comes on fairly quickly so that you are struggling with a second or two. No wheel slip occurs for the first 6-7 efforts so your best workouts. After that I believe the "grit" on the tape seems to lose some adhesion and you start to smoothen the area where the tire comes into contact with the roller.
Dan
ps. I thought on the Kurt Kinetic site there was a retrofit for the normal Kurts to accomodate a larger/heavier flywheel.
http://www.kurtkinetic.com/resistance-unit-p-153-l-en.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joseph
Pro
Joined: Aug 19, 2009 Posts: 1472
Home Track:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joseph
Pro
Joined: Aug 19, 2009 Posts: 1472
Home Track:
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hppy4u2 •wrote• After that I believe the "grit" on the tape seems to lose some adhesion and you start to smoothen the area where the tire comes into contact with the roller.
If you pull the thing apart and bring the roller to a machine-shop and have them knurl it your 3M tape and tire-dust days are over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CQ
Pro
Joined: Mar 12, 2009 Posts: 1047
Home Track:
Dick Lane Velodrome |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|